Skip to main content
Geographic Information Systems

Return to Answer

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Petr Krebs
Petr Krebs
  • 10.3k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 33

You can always get an instance of the particular IGPFunction and execute it yourself. It is less convenient than using the IGeoProcessor since it requires you to handle the input and output parameters all yourself (which you probably know how to do if you develop your own tool), but it also allows you to have full control over the messages the tool produces.

You can always get an instance of the particular IGPFunction and execute it yourself. It less convenient than using the IGeoProcessor since it requires you to handle the input and output parameters all yourself (which you probably know how to do if you develop your own tool), but it also allows you to have full control over the messages the tool produces.

You can always get an instance of the particular IGPFunction and execute it yourself. It is less convenient than using the IGeoProcessor since it requires you to handle the input and output parameters all yourself (which you probably know how to do if you develop your own tool), but it also allows you to have full control over the messages the tool produces.

Source Link
Petr Krebs
Petr Krebs
  • 10.3k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 33

You can always get an instance of the particular IGPFunction and execute it yourself. It less convenient than using the IGeoProcessor since it requires you to handle the input and output parameters all yourself (which you probably know how to do if you develop your own tool), but it also allows you to have full control over the messages the tool produces.