Timeline for osm2po vertices table, what does ref_count stands for?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2013 at 9:39 | comment | added | Carsten | It's better to not rely on it. I've modified the chart above and enriched it with A,B and C denoting original OSM Ways. There are two options: A and B are different ways, then ref_count=2, but if they've been tagged as one single way, you'll receive a ref_count of 1. | |
| Jul 3, 2013 at 9:34 | history | edited | Carsten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2013 at 17:50 | vote | accept | yaron | ||
| Jul 2, 2013 at 17:50 | vote | accept | yaron | ||
| Jul 2, 2013 at 17:50 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 21:15 | comment | added | yaron | im sorry, i meant which cases do not count in most cases. thanks. | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 21:05 | comment | added | yaron | and also which cases do count in most cases? i.e when it will not be accurate, may be it accounts for the differences i see. | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 20:58 | comment | added | yaron | i see thanks for your help! and even more so your amazing tool! would u say that i can count that ref_count count is without fault? (when i count myself i get slightly different results even with +1, it is very possible that i still have some bugs in my code), much obliged. | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 17:16 | history | answered | Carsten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |