Timeline for World coverage in OpenLayers 2?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 12, 2017 at 10:44 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| S Jun 12, 2017 at 10:44 | history | suggested | til | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| Jun 12, 2017 at 10:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 12, 2017 at 10:44 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2013 at 11:41 | comment | added | Saryk | If I am not mistaken, WMS sends an image made from the vector data stored on the server, as WFS sends the data itself, which is interpreted by your GIS... If you're not using that data, it won't make much of a difference, except when zooming (an image will pixelate, while vector data will be redrawn and adjusted, therefore will be less aliased.) | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 10:26 | vote | accept | ScottFree | ||
| Oct 3, 2013 at 10:25 | comment | added | ScottFree | Debatable! Seeing as I'm using the data for nothing but a baselayer I don't see any reason to use WFS over WMS!? | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 9:29 | comment | added | Saryk | If you're working with a shapefile, wouldn't it be better to use WFS over WMS for the data transfer ? | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 9:09 | answer | added | Jorge Sanz | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 15:41 | history | asked | ScottFree | CC BY-SA 3.0 |