Timeline for Choosing database for storing spatial data?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 21:23 | comment | added | djq | I've also found the learning curve steep, but postgis/postgresql is excellent. I highly recommend PostGIS in Action (postgis.us) if you do consider using it! | |
| Jul 29, 2010 at 3:36 | vote | accept | Nathan W | ||
| Jul 23, 2010 at 12:54 | comment | added | user173 | +1 for PostGIS. Its my central data store that works well with Arc, R and Python without a flaw so far | |
| Jul 23, 2010 at 0:29 | comment | added | George Silva | PostGIS is actually the most mature spatial implementation (comparing sql server 2008, oracle spatial, db 2 spatial blade (or whatever name it is), mysql spatial, etc.) Routing, Geocoding, Spatial logging, raster support. for free! | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18 | comment | added | dassouki | I find with PostGIS / pgrouting, there is a bit of a steep learning curve, but once you get over it, it's really quiet excellent and gerat | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 23:08 | history | edited | Jonas | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 22:24 | history | answered | Jonas | CC BY-SA 2.5 |