14

I'm looking for a way to create a voronoi diagram based on line segments instead of points. See the example below (taken from this presentation).

Ideally I'd like something I can script from Python, but a solution using ArcGIS or similar would also be acceptable.

voronoi diagram from line segments

The only library to do this I've found so far is openvoronoi, which looks promising. Are there any others?

5

We (a university team) designed an implementation for this using an ArcGIS 10.0 addin and ArcObjects. The application is completely free. The implementation uses a raster methodology that takes as input points, lines or polygons to create ordinary or multiplicatevly weighted Voronoi diagrams (or a combination of the above, i.e. you can use one of each type of shape, creating a single diagram set from up to three distinct feature classes). It's still in development but should be fairly stable, especially if you only want to do lines. The addin requires the Spatial Analyst license to operate. The code itself is open source, so feel free to do with it as you please.

https://github.com/UNTGeography/VoronoiDiagramsGIS

It uses a similar method as the "Euclidean Allocation" described in @radouxju's answer and uses Flow Direction/Basin raster to create vector polygons from the resultant raster.

| improve this answer | |
3

Voronoï is initially designed for points. Here are the two methods I can imagine for your problem (citing ArcGIS tools, but probably possible with shapely):

1)

a) create points along the lines (e.g. densify then feature vertices to line)

b) create Thiessen polygons

c) dissolve the Thiessen polygons based on the lines that they intersect

2)

a) with spatial analyst, compute the Euclidian allocation to the lines

b) convert each zone to a polygon

| improve this answer | |
3

For some customers a couple of workmates and I have been working on creating 2 geoprocessing tools that do that. While the geoprocessing tools are not publicly available, the python and C# we have used are :

Both the C# and the python wrapper actually rely on the C++ Boost Voronoi API: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/libs/polygon/doc/voronoi_main.htm

Note that the API consumes a lot of memory. This is not a problem if you're using Geoprocessing for 64 bit, ArcGIS Pro, or QGIS. This is a limitation if you're on ArcGIS Desktop as it a 32 bits. (A detailed road network of 40,000 rows or more should be enough to reach the memory limit)

| improve this answer | |
2

ET Geowizards (A plugin for Arc) has a tool for this that accepts Polylines (see screenshot below). Unfortunately you will need the licensed product to run the tool, but I think it should do the trick.

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
0

Plus one more way to solve your task using PostgreSQL/PostGIS.

If the lines are short and simple, then run the script:

WITH
tbla AS (SELECT (ST_Dump(geom)).geom geom FROM <line_name_table>),
tblb AS (SELECT (ST_DumpPoints(geom)).geom geom FROM tbla
        UNION
        SELECT ST_Centroid(geom) geom FROM tbla),
tblc AS (SELECT ((ST_Dump(ST_VoronoiPolygons(ST_Collect(geom)))).geom) geom FROM tblb)
SELECT ST_Union(a.geom) geom FROM tblc a JOIN tbla b ON ST_Intersects(a.geom, b.geom) GROUP BY b.geom;

See the result.

If the lines are long, then run the script:

WITH
tbla AS (SELECT (ST_Dump(geom)).geom geom FROM <line_name_table>),
tblb AS (WITH btbl AS (SELECT (ST_Dump(geom)).geom geom FROM tbla),
intervals AS (SELECT generate_series (0, 9) as steps)
SELECT steps AS stp, ST_LineInterpolatePoint(geom, steps/(SELECT count(steps)::float-1 FROM intervals)) geom FROM btbl, intervals GROUP BY intervals.steps, geom),
tblc AS (SELECT ((ST_Dump(ST_VoronoiPolygons(ST_Collect(geom)))).geom) geom FROM tblb)
SELECT ST_Union(a.geom) geom FROM tblc a JOIN tbla b ON ST_Intersects(a.geom, b.geom) GROUP BY b.geom;

See the result.

If necessary, compact the number of points on the lines, in my example this is the 10 point.

Original solutions.

This script is called: ST_VoronoiDiagramsFromLines.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I've not run this yet, but it looks like it creates the voroni polygons using the vertices of the geometries then merges them (with a union) if they touch the original geometries. Is that correct? If so it's an OK approximation as long as your original geometries have lots of vertices and no long segments without any. – Snorfalorpagus Jan 22 at 17:28
  • Tested by: PostgreSQL 11.1, PostGIS 2.5 USE_GEOS=1 USE_PROJ=1 USE_STATS=1... – Cyril Mikhalchenko Feb 15 at 16:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.