This is my very first question here, so bear with me!
I'm implementing a back end for a mobile app which will have to do proximity searches to find nearby POIs (points os interest). I know it's a very common scenario and looks very simple, but there are many different ways I could implement it, so I would love to see how more experienced professionals are implementing these simple spatial searches.
Since a POI is just a POINT we don't need any complex calculations involving intersections or the like. That's why I initially thought that using GEOGRAPHY columns and spatial indexes could be overkill or even slower than other strategies. So I've narrowed it down to 3 approaches:
1) GEOGRAPHY column + Spatial Index
This is perhaps the de facto solution to this problem. Since we have spatial indexes and geography columns we could just use it and search by distance. Something like this.
SELECT * FROM POIs WHERE Loc.STDistance(@radius) <= @distance;
Since we have a spatial index on Loc, it should be very fast.
2) Using a "bounding box" over Latitude and Longitude columns
This is the trivial approach without involving spatial indexes. We find a bounding box for our point and radius then simply search on the Latitude and Longitude columns. If both are indexed this search should be very fast. We'll have to apply the distance function to filter out some values outside the "circle" but withing the bounding box. But that should be pretty fast. This idea is better explained here: http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-db.html
Something like this:
DECLARE @lat float DECLARE @lon float SET @lat = -23.001029 SET @lon = -43.328422 DECLARE @maxLat float, @minLat float, @maxlon float, @minLon float DECLARE @R float DECLARE @distance FLOAT = 100 -- A distance in meters SET @R = 6378137 -- Earth SET @maxLat = @lat + DEGREES(@distance/@R) SET @minLat = @lat - DEGREES(@distance/@R) SET @maxLon = @lon + DEGREES((@distance/@R/COS(RADIANS(@lat)))) SET @minLon = @lon - DEGREES((@distance/@R/COS(RADIANS(@lat)))) SELECT * from POIs WHERE Lat Between @minLat And @maxLat And Lng Between @minLon And @maxLon
3) Use an integral GEOHASH stored on an indexed column
This approach is very interesting and it is something people are using together with REDIS ordered sets to do proximity searches. The principle can be transposed to SQL Server by using an indexed column that stores the integral GEOHASH.
I've got this idea from Ardb: https://github.com/yinqiwen/ardb/wiki/Spatial-Index
It's also explained in a little friendlier manner here: Using geohash for proximity searches?
In other words one would compute a GEOHASH with a bit-depth corresponding to the radius of the search one desires, then compute 8 neighboors geohashes and finally submit a search using these geohashs as bounding boxes on the indexed column. This will be 9 BETWEEN operators on the WHERE clause of the SQL... The results will have to be filtered out due to some spurious POI being returned.
But it looks that this will be slower than method 2 as the where clause will be more complex although it will only query over a single column instead of two.
Does anyone have any experience to share on this? Is there a better/correct approach to this?