# Single Tree detection in ArcMap? [closed]

I was wondering how I could extract "crown area" of single trees in a forest from a high-resolution image with only 3 band (RGB) in ArcMap. ( No NIR to use NDVI as any threshold).

I need a fast easy-to-do way to come up with a shapefile with polygons (made of several pixels depending on size of each individual tree). Here was I was thinking : Focal Statistic - Conditional (Raster calculator)- Extracr Attributes- Convert to polygon

I just need trees (to calculate their diameter at the end) in the forest. No matter the species or whatever.

I am using eCognition but I want to try ArcMap/ ( It's ok if its not 100% accurate!!! )

## closed as too broad by PolyGeo♦Sep 6 '16 at 7:56

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Could you provide a screenshot showing the type of trees and surrounding vegetation? What type of 3-band imagery are you using? What is the spatial resolution? – Aaron Oct 22 '14 at 18:55
• Its just an image taken from Google-earth! There is just one type of species but surrounding areas are mainly bare land, bareland+grass and some urban areas which I am not interested in any of them! I just want to throw away any none-tree objects and then find the CPA. – G.Z Oct 22 '14 at 18:58
• Have you tried calculating any texture metrics in eCognition? – Aaron Oct 22 '14 at 19:00
• Nope! I used brightness and Mean-Layer 2 for classification of shadow, forest, bareland, ...I wanted to extract polygons as trees to ArcMap but then it wasn't giving good results. Now I just want to use ArcMap to find trees(brighter and higher in pixel value) and make polygons for each single one. – G.Z Oct 22 '14 at 19:02
• Focal Statistic - Conditional (Raster calculator)- Extract Attributes- Convert to polygon.... This one works somehow but the final polygons are not exactly matching the tree-positions! It needs serious improvements! – G.Z Oct 22 '14 at 19:05