Using ArcGIS, I have to calculate areas of huge polygons all over the Pacific Oceans betwwen 20N and 30S. I have been trying different Equal-areas projections (Cylindrical and sinusoidal for example) and found different results for the area claculation.
For example, one polygon is having a surface of 1'604'176 km2 with Cylindrical and a surface of 1'605'483 km2 with sinusoidal...
So my questions are:
- Am I correct to use Equal area projections for calculating areas? Should I be using a different type of projections (equidistance...)?
- How can you have different results between the projections and which one should be consider best?
- At last, using an equal area projection, I discover that if I break down a big polygon into 6 smaller polygons and I compare the sum of the areas of the 6 smaller polygons with the area of the big polygon, I have a difference between the values (difference of 60Km2 for a polygon of 1'600'000Km2). How is it possible?