I have some plots of land spread across the landscape. Sometimes a parcel is subdivided in different sectors. For each parcel (and, in case of subdivision, for each sub-section) the quality of agricultural yield is known - binary coded as good or bad.

With the ultimate goal to assess what topographic/environmental IV (say, slope, elevation, distance from water reservoirs, etc) may have influenced the binary DV (by using Logistic Regression), I am wondering what could be a sound sampling strategy.

The starting point would be to draw a number of points within the parcels, then for each of them record the value of the DV (whether the quality is optimal or not) and the values of the IVs.


  1. I am unsure which is (more) correct: (a) to draw equally-spaced points or (b) to draw random distributed points?
  2. In either approach, since the total area of good quality land is not equal to the total area of bad land, should the number of (random?) points be equal across the two qualities, or proportional to the size of each area?

1 Answer 1


I don't know that either would be 'more correct'. I would probably lean toward random points, since any regular spacing might introduce bias based on the pattern.

You do not want an equal number of points. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modifiable_areal_unit_problem Three samples of a large variable polygon might fall on values the same as a uniform small polygon, yet 80% of the larger polygon could be a completely different value. The number of sample points should be proportional to the area covered to ensure an accurate representation of variability.

  • I should add that I have minimal knowledge and experience with statistics, and probably fall into that 'know enough to be dangerous' category (or know x but not why, or at least not fully understand it). There are some other experts on here who may provided more detailed explanation/answers (or say I'm wrong and why), or you may have better luck with this question on Cross-Validated.
    – Chris W
    Jun 5, 2015 at 21:31
  • Thank you @ChrisW, your feedback is appreciated. I will surely look into the MAU problem. I agree with you as to the proportional coverage of the areas.
    – NewAtGis
    Jun 6, 2015 at 9:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.