Searching for an answer to this question, I found instructions posted by Gulf of Maine Research Institute showing how to create a globe.

enter image description here

Using manual methods ...

enter image description here

What approach would I take to create a globe using GIS?

What projection should I use for each individual gore?

If I wanted fewer seams near the poles, is there some other projection I could use?

Could I do a series of projections to create the gores based on a soccer ball and stitch them together?

enter image description here

How would I determine the point of tangency for each pentagon and hexagon, along with their vertices in latitude/longitude?

enter image description here

Would some other non-soccer-ball isohedron be more suitable?

  • 2
    Being based on Open Office it's not "GIS", but Gene Keyes is working on a Cahill-Keyes map projection which works equally on paper and wrapped on a globe. It's actually through Gene that I discovered the globes mentioned in my answer to your linked question. It has been my intention to port Gene's work to real GIS, but have nothing to show for it yet. Brighter minds than mine are needed to make progress I think ;-) Commented Oct 12, 2011 at 17:49
  • I coded the sinusoidal intercepted projection (the first image posted by the OP) in javascript to make my own 7 meters diameter globe. You can check it here: winski.net/?page_id=12. You only need to pick your input image, number of gores, and click "project".
    – Michał
    Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 2:59

3 Answers 3


You want to use conformal projections for good shape matching. To that end, there's almost nothing better than Transverse Mercator for the first solution (stitching lunes together). Almost all GISes come with a complete system of creating 60 such pieces: the UTM zones. UTM also offers a solution for the convergence of thin sheets at the poles: it includes polar azimuthal projections, which you can paste as two caps at the top and bottom of the globe. You can adapt this method if you want to use fewer pieces; e.g., take every third UTM zone, expanding by 6 degrees on either side, for a 20-piece (plus 2 cap) solution.

Yes, you can use polyhedra. They don't even have to correspond to regular solids; they can be as irregular as you like. The problem becomes choosing the correct set of basepoints, clipping the polygons, and (if you wish to print the template as one image to be folded and glued) orienting the projections appropriately: the GIS has to handle oblique projections in full generality. Few GISes currently do that (ArcGIS does not, AFAIK).

The vertices of polyhedral dissections, in lat-lon, can be worked out geometrically. Many are available as datasets. You can probably find them in old SIGGRAPH archives. Mathematica is distributed with coordinates (and topological connections) for 195 polyhedra, for instance. (The coordinates are given algebraically in Cartesian coordinates, but these are readily evaluated numerically and projected radially onto a concentric sphere.) For example, here is the "MetabigyrateRhombicosidodecahedron" with its vertices projected onto a sphere:

Solid view

and its "net image:"

Net image

Want its coordinates? Consult Wolfram Alpha.

  • 1
    Thanks for the well thought out response! I'm amazed (and a bit frightened) by what Wolfram Alpha can do. Commented Oct 12, 2011 at 22:13

Carlos Furuti's excellent site on map projections has a page on fold out maps using various polyhedral base shapes along with downloadable pdfs for same. There are formulas for building the projections embedded throughout the pages. I don't think there is is anything gis-ready, but there is a lot of information there so I could have just missed it.

Also see related What strategies, criteria, or rules to use for selecting coordinate systems? question for good resources.


Transverse Mercator is not a good choice of projection for making globe gores. You should use the Cassini projection instead. The graph below shows the difference between the width of a 30° gore and the distance measured on the globe for five projections and the full range of latitudes.

Total overlap relative to globe diameter

For instance, 12 transverse Mercator gores on a 60-centimetre globe overlap at the equator by 0.0365 × 60 cm = 2.19 cm overall.

See my Quora answer for the full details.

  • Linked Quora answer not available.
    – Grimxn
    Commented Apr 8, 2023 at 16:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.