I have a point shapefile that I want to convert to a raster image using ArcMap 10.2. The shapefile has a number of points on top of each other. Each point is a fire. I want to make a fire frequency raster.

What functions within the conversion toolbox do I use?

  • Do you want each cell of the raster to be the number of points from your point shapefile in that cell? – Spacedman Jul 8 '16 at 16:56

If you are simply looking to assign the raster value based on the number of points in a cell, the tool you'll use is 'Point to raster' in Conversion Tools->To Raster. For the 'Cell assignment type' you will select Count.

If you points hold counts or some sort of other attribute you need to sum, then select the appropriate operator from the menu and the field you are looking to add up.


This would not be fire frequency because, if it is point data, it would either be an ignition event or an area (polygon) generalized into a point location. Thus it would aptly be ignition frequency or a misrepresentation of a fire process. Inherently, fires occur across space and as such are associated with area and not discrete point location(s). Sorry about the semantics, but this is actually important terminology. If you data represents actual fire perimeters that have been generalized into point locations then it is quite invalid for any type of spatial analysis because there are variable areas associated with each point.

As to your question, please realize the the results could vary wildly given different raster cell resolutions. However, you can use the Point to Raster tool with "count" as the option for the cell_assignment argument. This will give you the number of points intersecting each cell and thus, frequency.

I imagine that you will receive advice to interpolate this data. This would not be appropriate because you are not interpolating a process that varies with space. Even if you had data that represented actual fire perimeters. In fire, there is a very strong anisotropic process (directional effect), that represents a specific spatial process associated with each given fire. Because of this approaches like Kriging are less than optimal and require some degree of savvy to fit the appropriate model and would have to be done for each fire before deriving frequency. I am not even sure that you could fit a cohesive spatial interpolation model to something like fire frequency because it likely does not follow an explicit spatial process. If you find that it does, publish it fast!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.