0

I'm using RTKLIB with my own rover and base station. Most of the time I have a "float" solution. Would setting a more accurate position of the base station in the RTKLIB settings help to have more a "fix" solution? I don't care about an absolute solution, only relative.

5
  • Base is normally there to have much longer measurements and thus a better precision isn't it? I don't know why you only got a 'float' solution. Do you have an explanation? Jun 30, 2017 at 20:44
  • @s.k What do you mean with much longer measurements? The base is sends data real time to the rover.
    – MatMis
    Jun 30, 2017 at 20:51
  • @s.k I think you can take an avarage for a long time, but I just wanted to know if the precise position setting matters. :)
    – MatMis
    Jun 30, 2017 at 20:53
  • And where do these data comes from? I mean, are they processed, if yes by whom? Are they externally processed or directly within the base/laptop? Giving more informations on the configuration set could be better to help us understanding your situation. And if you don't need a precise positioning, I mean, the answer is in the question... Jun 30, 2017 at 20:54
  • @s.k the base is connected to the laptop that just sends data over wifi to Raspberry Pi that also has a receiver and where RTKLIB is running.
    – MatMis
    Jun 30, 2017 at 20:57

2 Answers 2

1

No, the precise position of the base doesn't matter if you only care about the relative position. A lack of accuracy in the base position is not what is keeping you from getting a relative fix.

0

No, It doesn't matter if base position is precise or just averaged.

As solution, it is sometime useful to try less GNSS i.e. GPS alone

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.