"4326 is just the EPSG identifier of WGS84" [3]

Indeed http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/html/ says it is a GEOGraphic Coordinate System:

        SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],

Citing [1], [...]

one of the most common ways the round world is displayed on a map is using the simplest projection we have:

x = longitude
y = latitude

The name of this projection is “Plate Carrée”, and is widely used because it is so simple. However we often seem to forget that we are talking about a projection. Therefore the spatial reference for this projection is very often (mis)referenced as a spherical coordinate system like for EPSG:4326.

In [1] then a correct WKT for the Plate Carée projection is reported (a projection is overlaid over WGS84/EPSG:4326):


which is ~EPSG:54001, except that units are not meters but degrees.

I am quite a bit confused for example if, at least in practice, EPSG:4326 is equivalent to Plate Carrée equirectangular projection.

E.g. in a computing environment, projected data is much more convenient since distances are Euclidean and not great-circles: would the distance between two points in EPSG:4326 be different then with respect to the same points in a Plate Carrée?

This is maybe specific to the single application, e.g. [2] Open Layers uses the term 'EPSG:4326' to mean the Plate Carrée projection. R seems to assume a spherical WGS84 instead (-> r-sig-geo).


  • 1
    To the best of my understanding, Plate Carree is not equivalent to EPSG:4326. The later is an unprojected (Geographic)CRS. whereas 54001 projects by assuming the Lon and Lat lines are equidistant, parallel lines. Plate carree causes severe distortion as you go north and south from the equator. Distances measured in 54001 will be different from distances in 4326.
    – Micha
    Commented May 20, 2012 at 10:35
  • @Micha: projecting a grid with projection 4326 in qgis shows that the meshes are squares, which is a plate carree or cylindrical equal-spaced projection (Porter W. McDonnell: Introduction to Map projections, 2nd ed, pages 23-25) AM I misunderstanding something??
    – Kurt
    Commented May 20, 2012 at 11:46
  • @Micha: now also pseudo Plate Carée is stacked over the top of my confusion. I'm lost. Any practical clarifying toy example?
    – Campa
    Commented May 20, 2012 at 17:53

1 Answer 1


Until today I had never heard of the degrees variant of Plate Carree.

I think you are probably looking for EPSG:4087 (see EPSG Registry) which has units of meters.

EPSG:4087 replaced EPSG:32663 which replaced EPSG:32662. Spatial Reference looks to be out of date in this regard.

  • 1
    mh, EPSG:4087 seems almost there. In the remarks of its definition I can see that is must not be confused with Pseudo Plate Carée (operation method EPSG:9826), which has angular units and is used "[...] only for depiction of graticule (latitude/longitude) coordinates on a computer display". ?
    – Campa
    Commented May 20, 2012 at 17:50
  • See EPSG Guidance Note 7.2, section for a complete discussion of the difference between Plate Carreé (a projection that can be applied to ANY Geographical CRS, not just WGS84) and Pseudo Plate Carreé (a not-a-projection that really shouldn't be used)
    – Grimxn
    Commented Aug 20, 2019 at 9:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.