Are the OGC-Simple feature access and the ISO (ISO/IEC 13249-3:2011 "Information technology - Database languages - SQL multimedia and application packages - Part 3: Spatial") significantly different (different enought to justify purchasing the ISO/IEC 13249-3:2011 PDF)?

  • 3
    I think it depends on what you are doing. If you are doing conformance / compliance testing, then definitely yes. If you are using some pretty standard queries and its working for you, almost certainly not. What is the goal?
    – BradHards
    Dec 12, 2012 at 2:02

1 Answer 1


If you are working with geometry types beyond the usual point/line/polygon/collection or are working with more than 2 dimensions, then yes, get the ISO spec. Otherwise, no. Also get the old OGC guidance on WKB for higher dimensions (or read the PostGIS doc) in case you're worried about maximum interoperability. (For 2d and simple geometries the new ISO stuff is a superset of the old stuff (and neither of them usefully describe how to handle EMPTY geometries in WKB, in 2d or otherwise)).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.