4

This question already has an answer here:

If I normalise a lidar dataset I am (according to my thinking) simply subtracting the first return heights from the ground heights. Thus the resulting dataset will only contains the height above ground and a mountainous region would then appear flat when visualised as a cross section profile. Is this correct?

marked as duplicate by Andre Silva, whyzar, aldo_tapia, Hornbydd, Vince May 24 '18 at 18:01

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • I'd argue that this question is different from the linked duplicate since it asks a different question, i.e. not how to normalize but rather whether the ground surface is flat in a normalized dataset. – WhiteboxDev May 25 '18 at 12:52
5

This is exactly what a white top-hat transform does. This is a simple mathematical morphology operator that involves differencing the original point elevations from the elevations derived from an erosion operation (minimum filter) on the point cloud, followed by a dilation operation (maximum filter). The following is an example of a point cloud for a mountainous area and the subsequent white top-hat transform on the same data:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Notice that the resulting surface is essentially flat, with elevations associated with the height of points above their respective local minima (i.e. the ground surface). This is also apparent in any profile extracted from their respective DEMs:

enter image description here

enter image description here

The white top-hat transform can be performed on a LAS point cloud using the LidarTophatTransform tool within the open-source WhiteboxTools geospatial analysis platform. I believe that this is how the lasheight tool of LASTools also works.

enter image description here

  • In my version of WhiteBox (current) the tool LidarTophatTransform is not there. I have version 3.4 Montreal (3.4.0) Released 2017 – Robert Buckley May 25 '18 at 9:08
  • @RobertBuckley Ah, I'm afraid that you are confusing WhiteboxTools and Whitebox GAT...two different products with confusingly similar names and that is my fault (if I could go back, I would have named WhiteboxTools something completely different). Anyhow, you need to download WhiteboxTools v.0.7 from here uoguelph.ca/~hydrogeo/WhiteboxTools/index.html – WhiteboxDev May 25 '18 at 12:10

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.