I have two sets of point data, structured like below.
Table A long | lat | class ... | ... | A ... | ... | A ... | ... | A Table B long | lat | class ... | ... | B ... | ... | B ... | ... | B
Both tables aim to capture locations of the same certain things, but Table B is much more granular than Table A. The result is that Table B is quite large (higher n) and Table A is more manageable.
I want to see if Table A is representative of Table B (in other words, is Table A "good enough" to represent table B?). How might I approach this? My thought was to see if they two classes are spatially correlated for a certain geography, but I don't know how I would approach this. I'm using R.