6

I have data in NAD 1983 Zone 20 and want to transform it to NAD 1983 CSRS Zone 20. I found this source: https://community.esri.com/thread/6772 which states:

  • NAD_1983_To_NAD_1983_CSRS_4 > 1950 Canada - Newfoundland, New Brunswick, & Nova Scotia offshore

Since I am not native in English, the word "offshore" bothers me. I hope somebody could confirm if this is the best transformation for data located in the Nova Scotia mainland or suggest a better transformation?

5
  • 1
    Offshore would mean one of the only parts of Nova Scotia that is in the Atlantic (Cape Breton or Sable Island). The issue here is that New-Brunswick is actually further west than Nova Scotia, bordering Quebec. I'm somewhat perplexed by the idea that NS wouldn't work as it's between NB and NL (Newfoundland). My main question is, though, do you really have to work in CSRS? I did work for provincial agencies recently and we used vanilla NAD83.
    – Gabriel
    Nov 29, 2018 at 14:23
  • That's a valid question. :) But unfortunately, some of my data are in NAD 1983 CSRS Zone 20 and some in vanilla NAD83.
    – Thomas
    Nov 29, 2018 at 16:22
  • I would contact ESRI. Or simply forego the problem and reproject using GDAL/QGIS which won't raise any issue with transformations. The variations should be extremely minimal anyway and unless you need topology to exactly line up between data sets (if that's an issue), it should be fine.
    – Gabriel
    Nov 29, 2018 at 16:52
  • I believe you would need to download the files for the transformation on the local or national government website, because ERSI does not provide those files with the installation.
    – FSimardGIS
    Nov 29, 2018 at 17:41
  • 1
    @FSimardGIS I had looked into that and when reading documentation from Geonova, it seems they don't have a .gsb for original to CSRS transformation.
    – Gabriel
    Nov 29, 2018 at 21:28

2 Answers 2

3

If you check the official definition in the EPSG Geodetic Data Registry, it lists:

Remarks: Used as part of NAD27 to/from WGS 84 transformation for offshore oil operations - see code 8647. Scope: Accuracy 1 to 2 metres. Used for oil industry operations only. Information Source: Various oil industry sources.

The transformation parameter values are zeroes, so it's treating NAD 83 and NAD 83 CSRS as equivalent within 1-2 m of accuracy.

Esri has been working on getting permission to redistribute the provincial NTv2 transformation files but we need to deal with each province separately.

Nova Scotia plans to release (not sure if it's available yet) a new NTv2 file but it converts between ATS77 and CSRS 2010.0. This would replace the older NTv2 file which converts between ATS77 and CSRS 1997.0. The paper is online here.

Even if you got either NTv2 version, there's no transformations available between ATS77 and the "original" NAD 83 that I know about.

Disclosure: I work for Esri and am on the subcommittee that maintains the EPSG registry.

3

NRCan has a NTv2 web tool that can be used to transform coordinates between the NAD27, ATS77, NAD83(Original), and NAD83(CSRS) reference systems using the binary Grid Shift Files obtainable from the relevant provincial offices. You can use this tool to determine if it's worth going through the effort of tracking down and acquiring the GSB shift files from the provinces for your scenario. (None of the territories have grid shift files yet.)

From this example result for a point in nothern Alberta we can expect a shift of a of 25 to 30cm using NAD83(Original) to NAD83(CSRS) 2002:

+------------------+----------------+---------------+
|                  |   Latitude     |   Longitude   |
+------------------+----------------+---------------+
| Coordinate       | 59.53642891    | -118.77687139 |
| Shift (metres)   | 0.257 ± 0.172  | 0.288 ± 0.195 |
| Shift (seconds)  | 0.008301"      | 0.018341"     |
+------------------+----------------+---------------+

At time of writing the available shifts in the tool are:

+-----------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------+
|       Coverage        |      From       |        To        |   Grid    |
+-----------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------+
| Canada                | NAD27           | NAD83 (Original) | NTV2      |
| Alberta               | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 2002 | ABCSRSV4  |
| BC (CRD)              | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | CRD27_00  |
| BC (CRD)              | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | CRD93_00  |
| BC (Vancouver Island) | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | NVI93_05  |
| British Columbia      | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 2002 | BC_27_05  |
| British Columbia      | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 2002 | BC_93_05  |
| New Brunswick         | ATS77           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | NB7783v2  |
| New Brunswick         | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | NB2783v2  |
| Nova Scotia           | ATS77           | NAD83 (Original) | GS7783    |
| Nova Scotia           | ATS77           | NAD83(CSRS) 2010 | NS778302  |
| Ontario               | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | ON27CSv1  |
| Ontario               | NAD27(MAY76)    | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | ON76CSv1  |
| Ontario               | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | ON83CSv1  |
| Ontario (Toronto)     | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | TO27CSv1  |
| Prince Edward Island  | ATS77           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | PE7783V2  |
| Quebec                | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | NA27SCRS  |
| Quebec                | NAD27(CGQ77)    | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | CQ77SCRS  |
| Quebec                | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | NA83SCRS  |
| Saskatchewan          | NAD27           | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | SK27-98   |
| Saskatchewan          | NAD83(Original) | NAD83(CSRS) 1997 | SK83-98   |
+-----------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------+

NRCan doesn't seem to have a corresponding tool to demonstrate the generic nation-wide NAD83(Original) to CSRS conversion results.

This info gleaned from the links in @rgmrtn's answer to NAD83 to NAD83(CSRS) transformation for Northwest Territories, Canada and deserved to be fleshed out for a general not-locale specific answer. Do go vote that one up and read the things I've omitted.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.