0

Results of Tabulate area and Zonal Geometry; total area are in red

Tabulate area results

I am working on Landcover map for Ghana. I calculated the area of each landcover type with Zonal Geometry in ArcMap. Then I wanted to know the area of landcover in each region (as in location). But when I used tabulate area in zonal statistics, the sum of total area for each landcover type among the regions was different from the one I had in using zonal geometry.

Please what could be the cause?

  • Could you provide some screenshots / additional information of what difference occur exactly? – Jochen Schwarze Mar 21 at 7:15
  • hi Jochen i have edited the post with screenshots – Mawuko Mar 21 at 10:28
  • Perhaps read how zonal geometry assign cell size for analysis. – FelixIP Mar 21 at 19:09
1

Yes, your results look weird because both approaches are using rasters. One would expect similar decimal accuracy.

I did an experiment: converting integer raster to polygon with all environment settings pointing to original raster. I also ran Zonal Geometry as table on original raster. It took awful amount of time to complete and I don't like results:

enter image description here

Also "thickness" of 8551 m is way off the estimates from both raster and vector approaches:

enter image description here

So check what cell size is set in your processing environment and if still in doubt, stick to tabulate area results.

  • the cell size is default – Mawuko Mar 25 at 18:53
  • This is an issue. Change it to land cover one. – FelixIP Mar 25 at 18:55
  • alright, i will try. thank you – Mawuko Mar 25 at 20:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.