I'm working on a problem to understand the relationship between two point-based datasets with different sampling patterns.
We surveyed random subset of properties in a neighborhood for the presence of object X, and then used aerial imagery to tag all the objects of type Y we could see. So objects of type X have both a binary value (present or absent from a property) and a magnitude value (how many); type X have lat/lons at the property scale.
Objects of type Y have lat/lons at an scale equal to the resolution of the imagery, which is like 30cm - 1m, so much finer than property scale. The aerial imagery also covers the whole neighborhood, e.g. all properties, not a subset of properties.
I'm trying to determine if there's any relationship between the 1/0 value or magnitude of type X based on the (number within a radius? clustering?) of visible objects Y, but I don't have much of a background in spatial statistics.
I've tried adapting methods like KCross.Inhom & creating my own inhomogenous poisson process etc, but I don't really know if this is a valid approach given the different spatial scales of the data and the results are difficult to interpret.
I've done an adaptive density interpolation over all objects of Type Y but don't really know how to compare if the value of type X has any relationship to the density (positive or negative).
Essentially, I want to do a montecarlo simulation giving all houses in the neighborhood a 1/0 value for object X and noting their proximity to (the denisty? clustering?) of object Y and then see if the pattern I actually observed is random or significant.