Is there a polygon simplification method that can create a polygon, such that the original is completely contained by the new one?

The aim is to create the new polygon from as few points as possible while maintaining a specified maximum tolerance. Until now I have been using a method that creates a buffer to a distance of specified tolerance and then uses a regular simplification method but that seems to be very inefficient as it sometimes creates an unnecessary offset. The original does not intersect itself.

My desired output looks as following


  • 2
    Maybe simplification and adding a buffer would be another method you should consider – babel Sep 6 at 6:00
  • 1
    @BERA convex hull does not account for tolerance. Also it does not simplify the polygon if its already convex – Jan Málek Sep 6 at 6:10
  • @babel You mean switching the steps of the procedure I have been using? The problem is the same - it creates an unnecessary offset. – Jan Málek Sep 6 at 6:12
  • 1
    Maybe it would be useful to have a screenshot or the vector-file to see what exactly you want to do. You want to simplify, that also means: changing the geometry, am I right? So dropping vertices, something like here: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Douglas_Peucker.png If you still want your original polygon to be completely covered by the simplified one - how should this be possible without an offset? – babel Sep 6 at 6:21
  • @babel you are correct, but I don't need the simplified polygon to use the vertices of the original. – Jan Málek Sep 6 at 6:31

Simplify your original polygon first. Than use the offset curves tool (from advanced digitizing toolbox - activate it if not visible) to enlarge the simplified polygon. Activate the snapping-mode and make sure that the enlarged polygon snappes to the point on your original polygon that is farthest away from your simplified one (to avoid unnessecary offset).

If offset curves produces round angles configure the parameters in QGIS options dialogue

See screenshot: Offset curves with snapping

  • Thank you for your solution to the problem. There is however still too much space between the new border and the old one. – Jan Málek Sep 6 at 9:01
  • Than use a less radical simplify-parameter - the more you simplify, the more different the two polygons will be - the more space you have between old and new border. Simplify without border would mean just to get back to your old polygon - and a more radical simplification (in the extreme case: just a triangle) means a lot of space in between. Optimal settings by trial and error, I guess - or do you have a clerly-defined amount of space that is allowed to be left? – babel Sep 6 at 12:10
  • I don't have a spacific reqirement for the amount of space to be between the two borders, I just see that in your example I could make it smaller without adding any points. – Jan Málek Sep 6 at 13:01
  • I don't see how you could do this automatically - if you simplify the geometry, you will always have some space left. Only way to reduce this space is to to reduce the amount of simplification (adjust the parameter in the simplification), so the line will be closer to the original polygon. Of course, you could manually adjust the result, but that's not what you want, I guess. – babel Sep 6 at 13:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.