Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Google Maps is really good when it comes to places data and navigation and still is one of the most popular options for normal uses but whenever I try to look up a GIS tech stack they uses Mapbox, OSM or something else for mapping but not Google Maps
I want to know why Google Maps is not popular with these frameworks?
Few to name
It's because the TOS of Google Maps only allow you to consume their imagery and maps using their API. See Section 3.2.4 e) from https://cloud.google.com/maps-platform/terms/#3.-license-
(e) No Use With Non-Google Maps. Customer will not use the Google Maps Core Services in a Customer Application that contains a non-Google map. For example, Customer will not (i) display Places listings on a non-Google map, or (ii) display Street View imagery and non-Google maps in the same Customer Application.
If you don't, you are already doing something risky or maybe illegal (if in a pro context at least) You can always bypass the limitations by making calls to Google Maps through their JavaScript API and sync the view within OpenLayers, Leaflet or Mapbox.gl (both Kepler.gl and Nebula.js use it). Several libraries does that:
You also need to be aware that Google Maps is also not the cheapest solution as in recent years, the cost to run a web map application using Google Maps skyrockets (moreover now, even for free tiers, you need a credit card). The other sources cost really less and for most cases are enough and in some cases they also are better for example for bike maps when using OpenStreetMap.
