0

I am trying to find ways to calculate a volume with :

  • 1 base DEM resolution 1m
  • 1 elevation DEM resolution 1m

First method: Using the extension volume calculation tool as follows. The result seems correct 22484 m3. enter image description here

Second method: I wanted to do the calculations by hand from a DEM representing the difference between elevation and base DEM. So in raster calculator : enter image description here

then in theory, I have to multiply number_of_pixel by surface_of_pixel by sum_of_pixel_value

With zonal statistics algorithm, I have number of pixels and the sum of their values (?). enter image description here

enter image description here

Here is the point : 56495 * 1 * 22503,27 = too many m3.
It seems obvious that I do something wrong in the second way but can't figure it out.

3
  • What is wrong with the native raster surface volume or the SAGA tool raster volume? – Erik Oct 29 '20 at 11:20
  • Sorry, I thought you were comparing 22484 m3 with 22503.27 – Luis Perez Oct 29 '20 at 12:28
  • @Erik both do not allow a second DEM, only a base height. – Leehan Oct 29 '20 at 12:46
1

I think your result is 22503.27, I explain:

The subtraction of the DEM generates the depths, each one of them is a cube, of area the dimensions of the pixel and of height the depth.

The area is 1*1= 1m2

Therefore, the formula would be:

Sum(depth1 * area + depth2 * area +.....) Which would be the same as area*sum(depth1+depth2+...)

The wrong thing is to multiply by the total number of pixels, that sum is included in the sum of the depths. Your operation would be 1 * 22503,27= 22503,27

Slightly different, which may be due to the optimization option

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.