While I know I can annotate within a map, what is being used for documenting your work:sources of data, choices of color/per layer with each map made ( thinking along the lines of templateing, so as not have to deconstruct a map after the fact ).

laundry list of what makes up the map, font selections, color choices.

migrated from meta.gis.stackexchange.com Apr 9 '13 at 17:16

This question came from our discussion, support, and feature requests site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals.


I think it's best to keep as much information as possible embedded into the map itself. This way if someone happens upon the data absent supporting documentation, they always have a means to understand it's context.

In QGIS, it seems there is a "metadata" section in the map properties. Access it by:

right-click on the layer > properties > metadata

here you can give the map a title and "abstract". I would use this field to document all the items you mentioned, but specifically would include:

  1. data sources
  2. method used to compute the map
  3. additional information/references needed to understand the context of the map.
  4. MOST IMPORTANTLY: your name/contact information.

In GRASS, a comment is automatically added to every map that describes the method used to compute the output image. It's a start, but in general metadata is invaluable.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.