# Dealing with Overlapping Coordinates in Statistical Analysis?

I decided to make an archaeological map about certain tombs distributed in the area of Crete and make some statistical analyses using the spatial statistical tools of GIS.

Specifically, I'll be using the nearest neighbor analysis to find out whether they are clustered and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to examine their relation to their elevation. I was faced with a dilemma - for several tombs the coordinates were exactly the same. Now this could have happened because they were constructed very close to each other and the GPS did actually capture the same numbers or the archaeologist who did the survey thought he should just take one point for the whole cemetery.

How can I deal with this problem?

Would it be wrong if I performed the test using more than once the same coordinates?

The maximum is three tombs having the same coordinates.

• Could you explain how the K-S test could be applied to "examine a relation" between locations and elevations? It is not normally considered for such applications, because it was developed to compare a univariate distribution of data to a reference distribution. It's hard to see how such a comparison could tell you much about location-elevation relationships. For clustering analysis, why does it matter that some locations coincide? What clustering method(s) are you using that would be sensitive to that? – whuber Aug 22 '13 at 21:22
• The answer to your question depends on the full size of the analysis area upon which you will be running your analysis. If the analysis is done over a huge area and the size of the cemetery is but a tiny blip on the map, then the cluster analysis differences will be insignificant. If, however, the cemetery in question is 50% of your analysis area, then you are going to have a problem. – Conor Aug 22 '13 at 21:24
• @whuber Thanks for your answer, I am trying to find out whether there was a certain pattern in the choice of the tombs' construction. So, yes I am testing the relation between the locations of the tombs and their elevation. They are not ordinary tombs they are very big structures and they might be also territorial markers... – Anna Xilakis Aug 22 '13 at 21:33
• @Conor the area is not huge nevertheless it is the area where these tombs appear so it's not random. The results showed that they are clustered. Would it be wrong, or is it a totally relative matter? Thank you for your answer :) – Anna Xilakis Aug 22 '13 at 21:34
• Regarding the post above, we cannot answer your clustering question without more information. Maybe posting a screenshot of the points with a scale bar would provide more insight. – Conor Aug 22 '13 at 21:55