6

I'm working with fish distribution data, and have combined several 24k habitat maps into a single layer that I'll call "critical habitat"

In merging multiple distributions into one dataset, there are line segments that overlap one another.

Part of my project involves measuring the stream mileage in this "critical habitat" data set, but because there are stream segments with overlapping geometry, I'm unable to simply calculate each stream length and sum the for the whole dataset. I believe doing so would 'double-count' in those areas where there is feature overlap.

Is there a way to merge these multiple overlapping features into one, or is there any way to accuracy calculate the total feature extent while avoiding any 'double-counting'?

2
  • 1
    Are the coincident lines exactly overlapping or are there slight differences between them?
    – mpianka
    Mar 21, 2014 at 1:26
  • The lines overlap
    – user28309
    Mar 21, 2014 at 17:41

2 Answers 2

7

A useful tool is the integrate tool, which will be easier than the create centerline tool. Make sure that you use this tool on a copy of your dataset or in an edit session (in case your tolerance was too large) because otherwise you cannot go back.

Also note that you can set an tolerance (in the environment settings) when you use a tool like "dissolve" in order to handle "nearly coincident" line as if they were coincident.

Finally, for more control on what you are doing, you could create a map topology, set "must not overlap" as a rule and use the ad hoc tools to clean the errors.

5

As you have yet to clarify if your lines overlap exactly or just are parallel lines, I'll give you two ways of doing it.

  1. Exactly overlapping lines can be merged together with the Dissolve function. Make sure you uncheck the "Create multipart features" checkbox.
  2. If your lines are just close to each other you can buffer them to polygons (use a buffer distance so that they overlap), and then dissolve your polygons. Finally you use create centerlines. The last function is from the freely available extension ET Geowizards, and unless you have heaps of lines that you need to process at once, that should do it with the free version. This will cause you to lose some precision in your data, but it's a workaround.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.