Why are poles data missing from most topographic resources ? Data from 60⁰ to 90⁰ lat frequently missing from topographic GIS data. Example with SRTM4.1:

enter image description here

Common sense or deduction lead me to think that either:

  1. Orbits: the orbit does not go to poles. Which is absurd for a topographic mission.
  2. Data : the data on poles is messed up. But come on, in 2010's, space agencies computer scientists are not able to clean this up ?

I asked myself this for years. Yet, I have no real, solid answer up to now.

Just for fun, if the there are relevant GIS resources for these 2 areas, please share.

Edit : - University of Minesota: REMA (Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica). Specifics: topography including snow layer(s), 1px= 8m, 60-88° South (Antartica),. Files: 2x2m;8x8m;...,. —♣ Comment(s): Full data is 43TB large!

  • 2
    There is only land at the South Pole, so there is no such thing as elevation data at the North Pole. Here is a elevation mapping project for the South Pole: nsidc.org/data/docs/daac/nsidc0082_ramp_dem_v2.gd.html
    – evv_gis
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 17:44
  • I'am not focused on the pole point but on the poles areas. Most data cover from 60⁰North to 60⁰S.
    – Hugolpz
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 17:46
  • Also, thanks for this source of good precision (200m) and filling exactly the missing degrees (60⁰S-90⁰S)
    – Hugolpz
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 17:51
  • 1
    Why should it be absurd for the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission to be limited to the orbit of the space shuttle?
    – Vince
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 19:14
  • 1
    That's just the point -- the space shuttle was not capable of a polar orbit, even if it had launched from Vandenberg.
    – Vince
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 20:40

3 Answers 3


SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) was a shuttle mission, no satellite involved. But essentially the satellites do not cross the poles.

In a sun-synchronous orbit, which most imaging satellites are in, you get a pattern like:

enter image description here

This is great because it means that the orbit can be timed and most parts of the Earth get covered at around noon, getting good lighting and few shadows. But essentially it is revolving around the earth in a way that the poles are never flown over.

Side effect stays, you may have missing information at poles, example with GDEM which covers 83⁰N-83⁰S : enter image description here

But as we see, polar areas present more artifacts. To avoid such corrupt data, the easy solution seems to cut out poles, and 60⁰N-60⁰S

  • It's what I was looking for. Yet, I'am surprised the data is only for 60⁰N-60S.
    – Hugolpz
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 19:39
  • Well I believe SRTM was designed to map topo data for areas where no other topo data was available, mainly developing countries near the equator. For some more coverage see: asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 20:18
  • I wonder of it's also due to the night.
    – Hugolpz
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 20:38
  • 3
    You appear to misrepresent what a geosynchronous orbit is. Regardless, plenty of satellites maintain orbits that cover the poles. Where they are situated is determined by their purpose. In this sense it seems you may have reversed cause and effect: the SRTM mission did not cover the poles because it was never intended to. That leaves us still seeking an authoritative answer to the question.
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 21:48
  • 1
    Hi @whuber definitely did not mean a geosynchronous orbit, I will edit the answer. Rather Sun Synchronous Orbit: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-synchronous_orbit So the closest they get to the pole is 83.4° at 16 orbits a day. Commented Aug 9, 2016 at 16:16

There is no SRTM data of the pole regions because

  • the shuttle flight did not cover that area and
  • the nature of the recording makes it difficult to gather data from ice areas (same as some mountain regions)
  • This is common sense or deduction. I look for an additional degree of why. Orbits: why the satelites don't go over there ? Data: why they can't clean up the data ? I ask myself for years without finding the answer.
    – Hugolpz
    Commented Mar 24, 2014 at 18:17
  • 1
    The first point here is the correct answer. The orbital inclination of the shuttle missions simply don't take them over the poles.
    – SeaJunk
    Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 18:35

The Shuttle Radar Topogrpahy Mission

The best source of topographic data we have is data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. This mission was flown in a matter of 10 days in 2000 with Space Shuttle Endeavour. The orbital inclination was 57 degrees. In principle, satellites can fly over the poles if the orbital inclination is close to 90 degrees. However, reaching a polar orbit requires more rocket fuel because the rotational velocity of the Earth that the rocket has at launch does not contribute to the orbital velocity for polar orbits (because a polar orbit is perpendicular to the ground velocity). Now, according to the journal article which reported on the mission:

The shuttle orbit of 233 km at 57° inclination was the highest possible for a fully loaded shuttle. (Farr et al., 2007)

So, all the fuel in the shuttle system (boosters, external and internal tank) was just enough to achieve a 57 degree orbit but a higher inclination was not possible. With this orbit, the mission managed to map all land between 56 degrees South and 60 degrees North (Farr et al., 2007).

Other missions

A few examples of DEMs that go further North:

  • ASTER GDEM V2 covers 99% of the Earth's land area, from 83 degrees South to 83 degrees North, at the same resolution as SRTM (30 meters).
  • There's a DEM of Antarctica at 1 km resolution collected by CryoSat-2.
  • ArcticDEM provides a DEM of Northern latitudes at 5 meter resolution.

But why?

Why no space agency has produced a truly global DEM with at least 30 m resolution is just a matter of speculation. But it probably comes down to: Not enough scientists begged for it and hence no money has been allocated for such a mission and later missions omitted the poles again because other conflicting requirements were more important.

Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., … Alsdorf, D. (2007). The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.