Skip to main content
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
pLumo
  • 6.6k
  • 21
  • 42

gdalwarp is doing the right thing: preserving total resolution of your image by changing the pixel-size.

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. ItThus, it could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 One meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters  .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30m / cos(69.53°) = 85.78 pseudo-meters

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters  .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30m / cos(69.53°) = 85.78 pseudo-meters

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

gdalwarp is doing the right thing: preserving total resolution of your image by changing the pixel-size.

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. Thus, it could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters". One meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters.

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30m / cos(69.53°) = 85.78 pseudo-meters

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

added 18 characters in body
Source Link
pLumo
  • 6.6k
  • 21
  • 42

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

3030m / cos(69.5353°) = 85.78 pseudo-meters

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30/cos(69.53) = 85.78

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30m / cos(69.53°) = 85.78 pseudo-meters

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

added 17 characters in body
Source Link
pLumo
  • 6.6k
  • 21
  • 42

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30/cos(69.53) = 85.78

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot IndicatrixTissot Indicatrix

© 2005-2015 Matthew T. PerryCC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30/cos(69.53) = 85.78

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

© 2005-2015 Matthew T. Perry

WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator is not good for measuring distances, because the projection is heavily distorted when moving away from the equator. It could be discussed if the units should be called "Pseudo-meters".

This especially happens the further north or south you're going. 1 meter in reality is approximately 1/cos(lat) pseudo-meters .

You can calculate the approximate pixel size for your raster image:

30/cos(69.53) = 85.78

Compare this with your gdalinfo output.

Tissot Indicatrix

CC BY-SA 3.0, Author: Stefan Kühn

added 138 characters in body
Source Link
pLumo
  • 6.6k
  • 21
  • 42
Loading
Source Link
pLumo
  • 6.6k
  • 21
  • 42
Loading