Timeline for Raster Volume Returning Wrong Volume
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2019 at 18:05 | vote | accept | GBG | ||
| Apr 19, 2019 at 11:17 | answer | added | Kazuhito | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 20:27 | comment | added | GBG | Thanks @Kazuhito. I have installed SAGA proper and created simple test data and I can confirm that your explanation is correct. If you add your comments to an answer I will mark it answered. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 16:21 | history | edited | underdark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed tag prefix from question title as per Jeff Atwood style preference
|
| Apr 18, 2019 at 10:15 | comment | added | Kazuhito | Unfortunately, when a data is on unknown-CRS, SAGA tends to assume it is geographical (latlong) coordinates. Your cell size (0.54 ft) is mistaken as 0.54 degrees (~ 30 miles or 160,000 feet) so the cell volume would be around 160^2 * 10^6 * height (ft). Then SAGA sums up all these cell volumes. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 4:52 | comment | added | GBG | @user30184, The elevation of the pad that the pile of dirt is sitting on is 8 ft above the NAVD88 vertical datum. I am interested in the volume of dirt above 8 ft. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 4:50 | history | edited | GBG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 17, 2019 at 20:56 | comment | added | user30184 | I wonder what is the value of Base Level. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 20:41 | history | asked | GBG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |