Timeline for v.generalize does not affect some boundaries
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2020 at 22:39 | vote | accept | Johannes Wolf | ||
| May 5, 2020 at 17:30 | answer | added | Babel | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 5, 2020 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackGIS/status/1257550648951914499 | ||
| May 4, 2020 at 23:22 | comment | added | Johannes Wolf | It is fixed now | |
| May 4, 2020 at 23:20 | history | edited | Johannes Wolf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2020 at 21:59 | comment | added | Babel | Your ShapeFile is incomplete, it should consist of several separate files (at least three of them), see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapefile#Overview - to avoid problems, use Geopackage, see: switchfromshapefile.org | |
| May 4, 2020 at 20:37 | comment | added | Johannes Wolf | With qgis:checkvalidity is everything fine. I had not yet set a snap tolerance, but my current attempts have so far not been successful. I will keep trying tomorrow. I attached my ShapeFile to the posting. | |
| May 4, 2020 at 20:35 | comment | added | julien | Suggestion: give a try to github.com/eurostat/RegionSimplify which should better handle complex topological situations | |
| May 4, 2020 at 20:28 | history | edited | Johannes Wolf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2020 at 17:42 | comment | added | Babel | With sharing the date I meant the original layer-data (Geopackage, ShapeFile or whatever you use), not an image file - on an image, you can't see geometry-errors and other problems | |
| May 4, 2020 at 16:07 | history | edited | Johannes Wolf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2020 at 16:07 | comment | added | John | Did you set a v.in.ogr snap tolerance? If not you might try one. You might limit the tool to area input and output. | |
| May 4, 2020 at 15:34 | comment | added | Babel | Are there any sliver-polygons between the areas so that there would result new overlappings when generalizing? Did you check the layer for validity? In case you could share your data for the (original, not generalized) layer, that could help. | |
| May 4, 2020 at 15:17 | review | First posts | |||
| May 4, 2020 at 15:29 | |||||
| May 4, 2020 at 15:12 | history | asked | Johannes Wolf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |