Timeline for Count of points in shape
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14 at 23:16 | answer | added | Pieter | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 14 at 15:29 | history | edited | Babel |
edited tags
|
|
| S Jan 14 at 15:27 | history | suggested | Cluedoz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Including an example
|
| Jan 14 at 15:19 | answer | added | Babel | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 14 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 14 at 15:27 | |||||
| Jan 14 at 14:17 | history | edited | Vince | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
title as statement
|
| Jan 14 at 13:42 | comment | added | Matt | Join attributes by location does not remove features that fail the geometry predicate, they simply receive NULL in the fields that otherwise would join successfully. To show only the points you are interested in you need to apply a (spatial) filter - either with a symbology expression, a filter on the data provider, or by creating a new layer with a tool such as Extract by location. | |
| Jan 14 at 13:15 | comment | added | Babel | Hi Cluedoz, Welcome to GIS SE. 1) EPSG:3857 is a bad choice (Mercator projection heavily distorts), 2) what do you mean by "map" ("mapped" the population, it just "maps" out all the points...)? 3) Can be a bit more precise and post a screenshot of what you did, because from your description it's difficult to see what went wrong. | |
| S Jan 14 at 12:50 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 14 at 13:30 | |||||
| S Jan 14 at 12:50 | history | asked | Cluedoz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |