Timeline for Which format to choose to convert to ShapeFiles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gis.stackexchange.com/ with https://gis.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 30, 2014 at 11:28 | history | edited | JJD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add VRT file.
|
| Jan 30, 2014 at 11:06 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 17:56 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:54 | comment | added | Antonio Falciano | CSV format is more human readable than others and QGIS treats it very fine. IMHO the choice is very simple here. | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:53 | vote | accept | JJD | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:49 | answer | added | Antonio Falciano | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:48 | comment | added | JJD | The point is that I have no idea which source format and conversion tool allows to separate the data columns as desired for the ShapeFiles. That is why I do not decide on a format to work with. | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:45 | history | edited | JJD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add screenshot of QGIS attributes table.
|
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:45 | comment | added | PolyGeo♦ | It sounds like you are saying that four of the six are not working (well) for you and implied that you have not tried the other two. I think you should decide which is your preferred format and focus your Question on how to get that converted satisfactorily. If that works then getting the others working becomes more or less moot, or can be researched/asked separately. Dealing with six workflows in one Question is not going to align well with our Q&A format. Whereas one Question per workflow will likely yield a clean and valuable Q&A about each. | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:45 | answer | added | Luís de Sousa | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:36 | history | asked | JJD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |