1

I'm working on a coordinate library implementation and I seem to be stuck with the French Lambert coordinate systems. I'm using this page as a reference (can anybody confirm the results there are accurate?)

The individual steps in the conversion seem to fit, but my overall result differs up to 50m from the one computed on that web site.

Now step by step: I'm converting as an example the point 2.1°E, 49.8°N from WGS84 to EPSG27571 (NTF Paris / Lambert Zone I)

  1. WGS84 -> WGS84 Geocentric: 4122109.79, 151150.90, 4848460.24 (meters)
  2. WGS84 Geocentric -> NTF (PM Paris) Datum conversion using Bursa-Wolfe: 4122273.66, 151210.75, 4848135.39 (meters)
  3. Geocentric -> Geographic, including meridian shift to Paris: -0.004127387, 0.86917528, -49.58 (radians)

I'm quite sure the result is right so far, because these are the same values than said web page returns when using EPSG 4807 as target CS (and converting from grad(!) to radians).

  1. Geographic -> Projected coordinates using lambert conformal 1sp, with latitude of origin = 0.86393797974 rad, longitude of origin = 0, False easting 60000, False northing 1200000, Ellipsoid Clarke 1880 IGN: 582974.00, 1233402.04, while expected is 582976.09, 1233397.93. Offset is about 3-5m here.

I have verified the lambert conformal projection using an example for EPSG 24200 JAD96 Jamaica, therefore I also think that the projection itself is right.

The error increases the farther away from Paris I get. Not including the false easting or false northing values, the error (quotient between right and wrong values) is in the order of 0.997-0.9998. This looks like some scaling problem, and the WKT description for EPSG 27571 mentions some scale, but I have no clue where to apply that. I do have a scale in the datum, though.

Now: Where is the error?

1

The scale factor +k_0=0.999877341 is part of the lcc projection. I don't see where you applied that. The Jamaica lcc has +k_0=1, so no scaling there. This page has formulas for LCC 1SP and 2SP: http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/lambert_conic_conformal_1sp.html

For a reference, I suggest to use GDAL cs2cs for coordinate transformations.

You will get best results if you use a ntv2 grid instead of +towgs94 parameters, but that is independent from the projection scale.

  • Like 5 minutes ago I googled again and found that I overlooked that parameter. I'll try it, but some other task is pending first. Thanks for the link. – PMF Mar 1 '14 at 12:19
  • This did it, thanks. About the grid: I'm not supporting them right now. I might have another question about that later. – PMF Mar 1 '14 at 15:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.