0

I have an observer point (VP3) from which a consultant viewed bird activity on a site. See illustration of the site (blue polygon) with a colored scale of terrain height AoD in m (grey rectangles added before posting and should be ignored):

Site Including VP3 with color scale of Terrain Height

It is necessary to provide an illustration of what area is visible from VP3 in order to show what bird activity the consultant could have observed.

In doing so the following are assumed:

(1) The consultant was 1.8m in height.

(2) The observer was looking for birds flying up to 20m above the ground.

It was decided to use the Viewshed (Spatial Analyst) tool. However (2) above requires a change to the input raster. This was achieved by using raster calculator to create a new raster = Terrain Raster + 20m. This raster was checked and appears correct.

Viewshed was then run with the following:

Input raster: Raster output from raster calculator = Terrain height + 20m

Input point or polyline observer features: A point feature class VP3 only.

Output above ground level raster (optional): Not entered.

Z factor (optional): not entered

Use earth curvature correctional (optional): FALSE (not checked).

The output is not as expected:

Site Including VP3 with visible areas in pale green

The pale green represents areas that are visible. Referring back to the picture showing terrain across site, there is a gradual slope from high altitude to lower altitude from South to North of the site. Given the lack of hills in between the viewpoint and the area of interest (within blue line) it would be expected that almost all of the site would be visible.

To illustrate this further, the area directly around VP3 is investigated. See VP3 and two points, A1 and A2:

VP3 and adjacent points A1 and A2

Altitude has been obtained using the Identify tool:

A1: 238m VP3: 240m A2: 242m

Distances: A1 -> VP3 = 31m. VP3 -> A2 = 100m.

Considering the observer height of 1.8m and that features 20m above the ground are being observed, it is not feasible that A1 and A2 would not be visible from VP3.

What is the error in my understanding or my approach?

1

I'm not entirely sure that the output you have is incorrect. I would make a hillshade raster from your DEM and overlay the viewshed output on that to see if it makes sense then. Actually, using hillshades to sanity-check anything dealing with terrain is pretty helpful, in my experience.

The second thing I would say is that I think you may have gone about dealing with height of the bird above the terrain the wrong way. Adding 20m to your height raster would't change the viewshed for anything because everything was moved "up" by the same amount. The optional above ground level raster may be the way to go there. As it will give you a value of 0 for anything that would ordinarily visible and a value indicating the number of meters you would need to add to a cell's elevation to make it visible you could take the output from that and do a reclass. If you wanted a boolean style output, you could reclass 0 - 20 as 1 and everything else as 0.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.