1

I've a problem with my gdalwarp function.

What I've done:

I built a .vrt file from 6 .tif images:

gdalbuildvrt -overwrite /input/base.vrt /home/tiles/BASE/*.tif

My gdalinfo looks like that:

Driver: VRT/Virtual Raster
Files: temp/vrt/base.vrt
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_1.tif
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_2.tif
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_3.tif
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_4.tif
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_5.tif
       /home/tiles/BASE/17_BASE_6.tif
Size is 60007, 40007
Coordinate System is `'
Origin = (468000.000000000000000,5510000.000000000000000)
Pixel Size = (0.100000000000000,-0.100000000000000)
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left  (  468000.000, 5510000.000) 
Lower Left  (  468000.000, 5505999.300) 
Upper Right (  474000.700, 5510000.000) 
Lower Right (  474000.700, 5505999.300) 
Center      (  471000.350, 5507999.650) 
Band 1 Block=128x128 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Red
Band 2 Block=128x128 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Green
Band 3 Block=128x128 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Blue
Band 4 Block=128x128 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Undefined

Everything works fine until now. What I've done next is building one big .tif image from the .vrt file:

gdalwarp -multi -r cubic -s_srs EPSG:25832 -t_srs EPSG:3857 -cutline /shp/17.shp -crop_to_cutline -dstalpha -co compress=LZW /input/base.vrt /output/base.tif

But, now the gdalinfo from the output tif looks like:

Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFF
Files: temp/base.tif
Size is 47849, 25603
Coordinate System is:
PROJCS["WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator",
    GEOGCS["WGS 84",
        DATUM["WGS_1984",
            SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
                AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
        PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
        UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
        AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]],
    PROJECTION["Mercator_1SP"],
    PARAMETER["central_meridian",0],
    PARAMETER["scale_factor",1],
    PARAMETER["false_easting",0],
    PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
    UNIT["metre",1,
        AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],
    AXIS["X",EAST],
    AXIS["Y",NORTH],
    EXTENSION["PROJ4","+proj=merc +a=6378137 +b=6378137 +lat_ts=0.0 +lon_0=0.0 +x_0=0.0 +y_0=0 +k=1.0 +units=m +nadgrids=@null +wktext +no_defs"],
    AUTHORITY["EPSG","3857"]]
Origin = (952949.608269182615913,6400383.903813457116485)
Pixel Size = (0.154577105681076,-0.154574816517696)
Metadata:
  AREA_OR_POINT=Area
Image Structure Metadata:
  COMPRESSION=LZW
  INTERLEAVE=PIXEL
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left  (  952949.608, 6400383.904) (  8d33'37.77"E, 49d44' 3.40"N)
Lower Left  (  952949.608, 6396426.325) (  8d33'37.77"E, 49d42'40.66"N)
Upper Right (  960345.968, 6400383.904) (  8d37'36.96"E, 49d44' 3.40"N)
Lower Right (  960345.968, 6396426.325) (  8d37'36.96"E, 49d42'40.66"N)
Center      (  956647.788, 6398405.114) (  8d35'37.37"E, 49d43'22.03"N)
Band 1 Block=47849x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Gray
Band 2 Block=47849x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Undefined
Band 3 Block=47849x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Undefined
Band 4 Block=47849x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Undefined
Band 5 Block=47849x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Alpha

And those Bands causes an error in the gdal2tiles function:

ERROR 6: PNG driver doesn't support 6 bands.  Must be 1 (grey),
2 (grey+alpha), 3 (rgb) or 4 (rgba) bands.

Does someone has any idea what happens? Why is the Band 2-4 Undefinied and Band 1 Gray? I think it should like the gdalinfo from the .vrt file (=> RGBA)?

1
  • 1
    Is the fourth band of the originals images alpha or real data? What happens if you run gdalwarp without adding a new band with -dstalpha: Create an output alpha band to identify nodata (unset/transparent) pixels.
    – user30184
    Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 14:05

1 Answer 1

1

in my case I have same error - I remove parameter '-dstalpha' from gdalwarp command:

gdalwarp -multi -r cubic -s_srs EPSG:25832 -t_srs EPSG:3857 -cutline /shp/17.shp -crop_to_cutline **-dstalpha** -co compress=LZW /input/base.vrt /output/base.tif

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.