4

Essentially I want to union multiple (20) congruent line shapefiles, where overlapping line segments in the input shapefiles are combined into a single resulting output shapefile. But I can't union lines. So I'm looking for an alternative. The desired result, like union, would break all the overlapping lines into separate features and preserve the input attributes.

Merge doesn't work for me because the inputs are preserved as separate (overlapping) features in the resulting shapefile. I tried dissolving this result, as well as Split Line at Vertices without getting the desired result.

3

The topic that I think you are looking for is Linear Referencing and, to perform line-on-line overlay, the tool to use is Overlay Route Events.

I recommend reviewing About overlaying event data:

Overlaying events is another way to create new event data. This process combines two input event tables to create a single output event table. The new table can be used to analyze event data in ways not possible using traditional spatial analysis techniques.

The new event table can contain either the intersection or the union of the input events. The union of the input events splits all linear events at their intersections and writes them to the new event table. The intersection of the input event tables writes only overlapping events to the output event table.

Line-on-line, line-on-point (same as point-on-line), and even point-on-point event overlays can be performed.

Once you have the unioned linear events you should be able to convert them to features.

  • I'm brand new to linear referencing. From the original line shapefile seems like I want to 'Make Feature Layer', then 'Make Route Event Layer', finally 'Overlay Route Events'. But the MREL tool isn't accepting my shapefiles - either in a folder or gdb. – Laaaars Jul 31 '15 at 5:16
  • see above comment...@PolyGeo – Laaaars Aug 3 '15 at 22:06
  • @Laaaars That sounds like it should be a new question. – PolyGeo Aug 3 '15 at 23:24
  • I'd rather not split this thought process among multiple questions. Just in case, someone else comes along looking to union lines, and then they'd have to find my other question. Can we solve this here and I'll post the geoprocess? @PolyGeo – Laaaars Aug 4 '15 at 0:18
  • Sorry @Laaaars - as you will see from the Tour we are about focussed Q&A here which means one question per question rather than cross threaded discussions. – PolyGeo Aug 4 '15 at 0:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.